top of page
Writer's pictureAryaman Garg

Jai Narayan Misra v. Hashmathunnisa Begum, AIR 2002 AP 389, 397

FACTS:

Here, in accordance with the agreement to run the cinema hall in a partnership, one partner provided his land, and the other built a cinema hall on it. No provision in the partnership deed indicated that the parties intended to treat the properties as belonging to the company.


ISSUE:

The issue arises on the dissolution of the firm as to how the property was to be distributed among the partners?


JUDGMENT:

The court directed that the land remained the property of the lady owner and the structure of the other partner. The latter was entitled to remove all the removals from the land.

79 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Cox v. Hickman, 1860

Facts: As M/s. Smith and son, Mr Smith and his son had a partnership firm. Due to financial problems, they signed an agreement assigning...

Commentaires


bottom of page