top of page
Writer's pictureAryaman Garg

Osman Jamal and Sons Limited v. Gopal Purshottam ILR (1929) 56 Cal 262

Appellant: Osman Jamal and Sons Limited


Respondent: Gopal Purshottam


Decided on: July 19, 1928


Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court


Hon’ble Judge: J. Lord Williams


Area of law: Section 124 and 125 of Indian Contract Act, 1872; (Indemnity)


Facts- A company was acting as the commission agent of the defendant firm and in that capacity bought certain goods for the defendants which they failed to take. The supplier became entitled to recover from the company certain sum of money as damages for breach. The company went into liquidation before paying the claim.


Issues- Whether the defendant was liable to indemnify the plaintiff even though the latter had not actually paid the vendor?


Judgement- It was held that the Official Liquidator could recover the amount even though the company had not actually paid the vendor. The court, however, directed that the amount, should be set apart so that it is used in full payment of the vendor in respect of whose contract the company had incurred liability.

1,414 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Komentarze


bottom of page